Microsoft Flight: The Coconut Bra Says It All

“I won a Coconut Bra!”, I yell as I guide the Icon A5 down alongside the yacht off the coast of Hawaii.  “I won a Coconut Bra?” I question as my passenger disembarks onto a clearly computer generated yacht.   In fact, this question has been at the top of my mind since I started testing the demo version of Microsoft Flight, released on February 29th.

Icon A5 cockpit in Microsoft Flight

Icon A5 cockpit in Microsoft Flight

The second question I have been asking is “do pilots in the real world win coconut bras for successful landings?”  My answer to this is no, unless they are subject of a bad joke.   So then the third question becomes, “what is Microsoft Flight?”

Simulator vs Game

The purpose of any simulator is to replicate real world conditions to a reasonable exactness that would aid the user in experiencing the real world so that they can learn, learn to react to unknowns, and gain first hand experience.   The purpose of a game is entertain, often with the objective to collect prizes and achieve a goal.

The Icon Exterior with the cross-hairs for situational flight information.

I believe Microsoft Flight to be a major disappointment for flightsim enthusiasts and virtual pilots because my experience with the demo is far more representative of a “game” than a “simulator”.

The Evidence

To support this fact, I offer the community the following evidence:

  1.  With the demise of the coveted ACES Team, the “simulator” genre has been picked up by Microsoft Game Studios, who’s purpose is to develop games, not simulators.
  2. Flight has been distributed through the Microsoft Gaming – Live network.  In order to get it, you install the gaming distribution files on your computer.
  3. The word “game” has replaced references to “simulator” that were found in FSX.  In fact, “game” is the most prevalent word throughout the software package.
  4. I am unable to locate settings to adjust aircraft realism and more intricate commands to control more specific systems for the aircraft.
  5. I won prizes as I continued to “play” the game.  A ukulele and coconut bra add a certain amount of entertainment value not found in the real world aviation experience.
  6. Where did the real planes go?  No Cessna?  No Piper Cub?  This isn’t about aviation is it?
  7. The cross hairs that appear on the screen to help navigate by mouse cheapen the pilot experience. As does the HUD across the top of the screen (although having it there is growing on me).
  8. Flying in Free Flight mode was numbing… where is the crosswind? Where are the usual slight tweaks required to keep the aircraft on course?  Its like driving a stick shift and then switching to an automatic (Save the Manuals).

I will stop there as you get the drift of where this is going.  Microsoft outright abandoned real world arm chair pilots with this release.  After flying a few hours in the demo, I am NOT inspired to make the purchase of the full software. In fact I would rather buy a new add-on for one of the other beloved “simulators” that reside on my computer: FSX, FS9, X-Plane 9, and X-Plane 10.

A fitting end to a numbing flight, I crashed into a hangar post while parking.

I will say this though. I think Microsoft will sell Flight to bunch of beginner gamers that think they can brag about being an arm chair pilot after earning their coconuts bras in Flight.  For me, I will stick with a true simulator and wish Microsoft the best and hope their coconut bras are fitting well.

PS:  Do you think Bill Gates earned a coconut bra yet?


7 thoughts on “Microsoft Flight: The Coconut Bra Says It All

  1. Hey Guys, Come on, I must admit that I enjoyed flying with the mouse, and one thing FSX has taught me is to make proper landings, use check lists and fly well (monitor my heigh, monitor my speed etc). I got my Coconut bra with almost no effort. FSX has definately helped and taught me to fly properly, and this was evident when I flew on MS flight. But I do agree that it is not a simulator, I will still stick to FSX and when I need to mess around I will fly MS Flight.


  2. It will be really interesting to see how succesful this effort becomes.

    I don’t mind the cocount bra, but at least they could have divided the game into a serious part and an arcade part.

  3. Thank you both for the comments. As a more advanced simmer with high expectations, the X-Plane 10 release is much more important to me than Microsoft Flight. I wonder how much more Farmville and Angry Birds influenced this game rather than X-Plane 10.

    Reading the Flight Facebook wall, many other previous flightsim users are confused by the pricing structure and find the entire thing “bland’.

    Definitely interested in seeing how Microsoft responds.


  5. As soon as I realized I can’t use my CH flight yoke and rudder pedals I realized that this was just a game. Figures…..just another flying game. Yes I will stick to the tried and trues…..X plane 9 and 10

  6. umm you are nagging about that there is no real plane in it well google the icon a5 becouse it is real and you can buy and fly in it for real so start saving your money for it

  7. Lockheed Martin’s Prepar3d, screw Ms Flight.
    Prepar3d is based on the esp simulation engine and thus retains backwards compatibility with fsx add-ons so that expensive hangar isn’t wasted. It fixes most if not all issues fsx had and opens esp for even deeper simulation.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s